Writing
adequate literature review is a key component of dissertation, even of any
research in education. A well-written literature review accomplishes several
purposes. First of all, it allows researchers to survey literature and gain
detailed information regarding their interest areas. In doing so, researchers
might get some insights about central issues in a field and then can relate
their studies to the ongoing dialogue in the literature. It guides researchers
to find gaps in previous studies and to make further discussions about how they
extend previous studies. A good literature review allows researchers to
establish a framework for explaining the importance of the study.
The article written by Boot and Beile (2005) draws
attentions to the importance of writing qualified literature review in
dissertation. They underline the general weakness of dissertation literature
reviews. Even I found Boot and Beile’s article quite informative, I feel like
something is missing in the article. I wish they provided a further discussion
about the ways by which doctoral candidates can overcome all the weaknesses
they mentioned in the article. In
particular, I would like to have seen some lines in the article that how
doctoral candidates can get benefits from the library science to write a
qualified dissertation literature review. It seems to me the authors reveal
problems in relation to dissertation literature review, however they end the
article without proposing any solutions.
They make some recommendation in the final section entitled “ Looking
Forward”, but their recommendations remain too general, and do not address their
previous criticisms.
This
week, I finished reading with having more curiosity about using Mendeley .
Kern’s (2011) and Paulus, Lester& Dempster ‘s (2014) studies introduce
digital tools including citation management programs and their benefits in
terms of writing literature review. I have previously used Refworks, Endnote
and Zotero. It seems Mendeley is the
most developed citation management software.
I really like that it includes its own cloud storage and can be
synchronized. I look forward to gaining more information about Mendeley on this
Tuesday.
Naime, I think your point related to Boote and Beile's article is really critical. So, what do we do about all of these limitations and challenges? While there is no 'simple' way to engage in a literature review (time and commitment are always required), there are some useful tools that serve to systematize the process. Further, I've found that some of these tools also serve to allow you to carefully make sense of relationships across the literature. I'll look forward to your thoughts on mendeley.
ReplyDelete